Mark Gilroy

Bringing Books to Life!

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • MK Gilroy Novels
    • Cold As Ice
    • Cuts Like a Knife
    • Every Breath You Take
    • Just Before Midnight
    • The Patmos Conspiracy
  • Projects
    • Devotionals
      • A Daybook of Grace
      • God’s Help for Your Every Need: 101 Life-Changing Prayers
      • How Great Is Our God
      • Inspired Faith 365
    • Inspiration
      • God’s Way
      • Soul Matters
    • Gift Books
      • Crazy About You Series
      • Loving the Love of Your Life
      • Smiles
      • What a Wonderful Life Series
    • Christmas
      • A Classic Christmas
      • Just Before Midnight
      • The Simple Blessings of Christmas
    • Nightstand Reader Series
    • Publisher Highlights
  • Blog
    • All
    • Books
      • Author Issues
      • Book Publishing Q&A
    • Life Observations
      • America
      • Culture
      • Economy
      • History
      • Media
        • Movies & TV
        • Social Media
      • Motivation
      • Personal
      • Political
      • Sports
      • The World
    • Faith
      • Christmas
      • Inspiration
      • Prayers
    • Presentations
  • Reviews
  • About
    • Contact

Mark Gilroy April 27, 2009

Q: How Accurate Are Bestseller Lists?

Q: How accurate are bestseller lists?

A: Not very.

But that doesn’t mean they aren’t important. They are great for publicity and will probably help generate more sales. Many people peruse the various lists to help them determine what to pick up next. They are fabulous for an author’s ego. Admit it, wouldn’t you like to have the tag New York Times Bestselling Author under your name every time you published a book? All it takes is once!

Why aren’t they accurate?

Book publishers don’t use a upc code on the back of their books. Why? There is an ancient custom that book retailers should be able to set their own prices. UPC codes include a price. So traditionally, publishers have used an ISBN number and code. A few use nothing at all. That means a whole new reporting system is needed to gather point-of-purchase data. The biggest collector of this data is Nielson’s BookScan system, which is modeled after the music industry’s SoundScan.

But not all retailers feed their data to BookScan and not all bestseller lists use BookScan anyway. The New York Times has the most prestigious list, which is based on several large chains, a number of independent booksellers, and select mass market accounts. USA Today and the Wall Street Journal employ similar methods of sampling, including judicious use of BookScan. Ditto Publisher’s Weekly. However, many large booksellers – like Sams and a number of other mass market retail chains, schools, Christian bookstores, rack jobbers, e-books, and high volume tabletop display marketers – don’t provide their data to BookScan. The largest Christian retail chain doesn’t even provide its data to the CBA (Christian Booksellers Association) bestseller list. One wouldn’t, of course, expect the lists to account for other ‘special markets’ including direct sales nor organizational and author purchases. The good news is that Amazon and Walmart sales are now included with BookScan – but several of the lists resisted using Amazon’s sales until the last few years.

What percentage of book sales are reflected on bestseller lists? No one knows for sure based on all the above reasons. I’ve heard estimates ranging from 30% to 60%. Anecdotally, one author friend has now sold three million copies of a single book. Of those, 100 thousand have sold in traditional book selling settings and the other 2.9 million have sold direct to consumer, business to business, or through back-of-room sales when he speaks. Those 2.9 million units have never been counted on a bestseller list.

Because bestseller lists do create positive publicity and sales momentum there are more than a few occasions when authors and publishers have attempted to manipulate their book’s placement on the lists. For example, back when it was harder to track single store sales, an author or agent might order the five or ten or twenty or thirty thousand copies of a new book needed for speaking engagements through a single bookstore to ‘force’ a book onto the list. I’m sure this has helped ongoing sales just for the fact that accounts would see the book show up on a list and order more store copies. But point-of-purchase data, at least within a chain, is now sophisticated enough to spot this as an anomaly, not a trend. The New York Times at least used to put a dagger symbol next to books that had large bulk orders. (Do they still do that?)

There is a publisher axiom that says you can get a book on any bestsellers list through marketing but in order for it to stay on the list it has to be a great book that generates word-of-mouth advertising. Longevity of a book on various bestseller lists is almost always an indicator that the book has real ‘legs’. Or, in the case of books that sell hundreds of thousands or even millions of units and never show up on a list, they either need to be great or the author needs to have a great platform for moving product.

So bestseller lists are important indicators of what’s happening in major swathes of the book selling environment but they have information gaps in that environment and don’t even attempt to measure what’s happening in special markets, so they can’t tell the whole story of which books sell most.

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Related

Filed Under: Book Publishing Q&A, Books

Comments

  1. Jake Olvido says

    April 28, 2009 at 4:40 am

    Bestseller lists reflect only what is statistically read by so many at any given time but not necessarily individual reader preferences. At their revealing best, bestseller lists serve only as helpful, informative consumer guides on what’s hot and selling. The book readers concerned still have the final say what books they will actually purchase–if they do decide to purchase at all.

    Let’s face it: You and I–we have different book favorites, and the fact that we happen to like the same title or an author is merely coincidental.

  2. BookWhirl says

    April 9, 2013 at 9:27 pm

    Thank for posting it! I really had a good time reading it.

  3. Sue Harrison says

    April 23, 2013 at 6:15 am

    Interesting, Mark. Thank you for the information. Those illusive bestseller lists can be frustrating!

Mark is a publisher, author, consultant, blogger, positive thinker, believer, encourager, and family guy. A resident of Brentwood, Tennessee, he has six kids, with one in college and five out in the "real world." Read More…

Stay connected!


Featured Posts

The Secret to Writing So Others Will Like It

Write something to suit yourself and many people will like it; write something to suit everybody and scarcely anyone will care for it.  Jesse … [Read More...]

6 thinking hats for writing - white

6 Thinking Hats for Writing

Can a business strategy be used for the writing process? I thought I would give it a try with the 6 thinking hats for writing. In 1999, Edward De … [Read More...]

13 ways for an author to use google tools.

13 Ways for An Author to Use Google Tools

I have come up with 13 ways for an author to use Google tools that will enhance your productivity and the final product. I first wrote about writers … [Read More...]

More Posts from this Category

Facebook Author Page

Detective Kristen Conner Interview

Detective Kristen Conner

Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets

Copyright © 2025 · Streamline Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in